NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Monteleone v Griffith City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1435 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 17 August 2018 Date of orders: 17 August 2018 Decision date: 17 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raymond Monteleone (1st Applicant) Vicky Monteleone (2nd Applicant) Griffith City Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: P Vergotis, McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicants) J Fan, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/383798 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. Consent is granted to development application No. 98/2017 for the staged construction of new workshop & truck washing shed, new transportable building and use of existing buildings at Lot 198 DP 751709 known as 2724 Kidman Way, Hanwood subject to the conditions in Annexure A hereto. ………………………. Michael Chilcott Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (406 KB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 17 August 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate