NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.39) [2018] NSWSC 1286 Hearing dates: 16 August 2018 Date of orders: 16 August 2018 Decision date: 16 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: Dismiss the Notice of Motion filed in court on 16 August 2018 to strike out the evidence-in-chief of Mr Jesse Sheather. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – application by accused to strike out evidence-in-chief of a former police officer – Evidence Act 1995, s 33 not applicable – where it was asserted that witness refreshed his memory from documents without leave – Evidence Act 1995, s 32 not applicable – notice of motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Not Applicable Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) A R Conolly / E Ramsay (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) A R Conolly & Co (Accused) File Number(s): 2015/222068 Publication restriction: Not Applicable
EX TEMPORE Judgment (T.1731) 1. Application is made by Notice of Motion filed in Court this morning for an order that the entirety of the evidence-in-chief of Mr Jesse Sheather, a retired Detective Sergeant of the NSW Police, be struck out. In support of that Notice of Motion the Accused relies upon the affidavit of Ms Elizabeth Ramsay of 16 August 2018, to which was attached a statement of Mr Sheather dated 15 December 2015.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate