NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.44) [2018] NSWSC 1295 Hearing dates: 17 August 2018 Date of orders: 17 August 2018 Decision date: 17 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: 1. Running Sheet dated 1 August 1985 is admitted and marked Exh 79.
2. Pursuant to s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995, I limit the use of the material in the second and third paragraphs on page 3, so that the statement of Mr Robert Barnes and Mr J Gothard are not to be taken as evidence of the truth of their contents. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – relevance – police running sheet – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Not Applicable Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) A R Conolly / E Ramsay (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) A R Conolly & Co (Accused) File Number(s): 2015/222068 Publication restriction: Not Applicable
EX TEMPORE Judgment (T.1791) 1. The Crown tenders a five page Running Sheet written by the present witness, Mr Jesse Sheather, on 1 August 1985, entitled: "Post Blast Analysis of Jehovahs Witness Kingdom Hall, Verbena Avenue, Casula". 1. The Accused objects to its admission into evidence on the basis that the document amounts to hearsay evidence, including opinions expressed by other people.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate