NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Re Estates Croft, deceased [2018] NSWSC 1303 Hearing dates: 7-10, 14-17 and 21 August 2018 Decision date: 19 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Probate List Before: Lindsay J Decision: The latest will of each of June Croft and Warwick Croft should be admitted to probate. Neither will held invalid for a want of testamentary capacity. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Contested probate – Testamentary capacity – Joint hearing of challenges to respective wills of a married couple – Where each will-maker suffered some form of mental illness - Testamentary capacity found to exist at time of execution of each will
SUCCESSION – Contested probate – Testamentary capacity – Whether deceased was able to comprehend and appreciate claims to which deceased ought to have given effect – Extent of knowledge of estate property required for testamentary capacity – Testatrix not actively involved in the operation of family business – Will a rational, measured response to testatrix's perspective of family tensions – Testatrix found to have testamentary capacity
SUCCESSION – Contested probate – Testamentary capacity – Whether deceased suffering from insane delusions that affected provisions of will – Where testator suffered from or hallucinations –– Will showed rational, measured response to testator's perspective of family tensions – Testator found to have testamentary capacity Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 NSW Real Property Act 1900 NSW Family Provision Act Cases Cited: Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB, 549 Boughton v Knight (1873) LR 3 P&D 64 Bridgewater v Leahy (1998 194 CLR 457 Bull v Fulton (1942) 66 CLR 295 Carr v Homersham [2018] NSWCA 65 Easter v Griffith (1995) 217 ALR 284 Kerr v Badran [2004] NSWSC 735 Osborne v Smith (1960) 105 CLR 153 Re Estate Griffith (Dec'd); Easter v Griffith (1995) 217 ALR 284 ALR Re Estate of Hodges ( 1988)14 NSWLR 698 Singh v Singh [2018] NSWCA 30 Smee v Smee (1879) 5 PD 84 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757 Winter v Crichton (1991) 23 NSWLR 116 Worth v Clasohm (1952) 86 CLR 439 Zorbas v City Sidiropoulous (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 197 Zorbas v Sidiropoulous (No. 2) [2009] NSWSC 197 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757 at [44]; Woodley-Page v Symons (1987) 217 ALR 25 Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: In Case No. 2016/00033995 (Estate of June Croft) First Plaintiff: Anna Sanders Second Plaintiff: David John Sanders Defendant: Elisabeth Croft Elford
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate