NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Skinner [2018] NSWCCA 185 Hearing dates: 25 June 2018 Decision date: 29 August 2018 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Wilson J at [2] Lonergan J at [87] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against asserted inadequacy of sentence – aggregate sentence - intellectually disabled offender - offences involving imitation firearm – possess pistol – specially aggravated break enter and commit serious indictable offence whilst armed with a dangerous weapon – kidnapping - question of assessment of objective gravity - question of adequacy of accumulation of sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Palijan v R [2010] NSWCCA 142 R v Mooney (unreported, Victorian Court of Criminal Appeal, 21 June 1978, Young CJ) Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown – Applicant Todd Skinner – Respondent Representation: Counsel: M. England - Applicant S. Kluss – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate