NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Matthews v R; New v R [2018] NSWCCA 186 Hearing dates: 13 August 2018 Date of orders: 27 August 2018 Decision date: 27 August 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA Gleeson JA Fagan J Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – supplying prohibited drug contrary to Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(1) – one count of possession of cannabis taken into account on Form 1 for applicant Matthews – three counts of possession and cultivation of cannabis taken into account on Form 1 for applicant New – applicant Matthews sentenced to 3 years imprisonment with non-parole period of 1 year 6 months – applicant New sentenced to 3 years imprisonment with non-parole period of 2 years – whether error in assessing objective seriousness – whether error in description of applicants as "facilitators of supply" above "street level users/dealers" in chain of supply – whether material misdescription of time period of offending – applicant New mother of two children aged 16 and 18 – whether fresh evidence for applicant New demonstrates exceptional hardship on her children as consequence of her incarceration – parity – whether justifiable sense of grievance on part of applicant Matthews – leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Girard [2004] NSWCCA 170 R v Linden [2017] NSWCCA 321 R v Macdonald; R v Maitland [2017] NSWSC 638 R v Shortland [2018] NSWCCA 34 R v Tuhakaraina [2016] NSWCCA 81 R v X [2004] NSWCCA 93 Reg v Wirth (1976) 14 SASR 291 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard John Matthews (first applicant) Nicola New (second applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms Jane Paingakulam (first applicant) Mr David Barrow (second applicant) Mr Eric Balodis (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate