NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wingco v R [2018] NSWCCA 187 Hearing dates: 1 August 2018 Decision date: 27 August 2018 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] R A Hulme J at [39] Button J at [40] Decision: Application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against sentence – where applicant pleaded guilty to eight offences of stealing from the person – whether additional evidence should be admitted on appeal – where applicant had completed two courses while in custody – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to consider matters occurring after sentence – whether failure to consider applicant's medical condition – whether failure to consider family circumstances of applicant - where brother's medical condition not referred to at sentencing hearing – where no evidence of the brother's medical condition Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 94, 193C(1), 527C(1)(b) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 32 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2014 (NSW), cl 214A(1)(g) Cases Cited: Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118 R v Lanham [1970] 2 NSWR 217 Tran v R [2014] NSWCCA 32 Category: Sentence Parties: Leny Wingco (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (in person) Ms H Roberts (Crown Prosecutor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Applicant (in person) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/192287 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Date of Decision: 13 October 2017 Before: Girdham SC DCJ File Number(s): 2015/192287
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate