NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: William James Sandilands v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of Legal Aid NSW [2018] NSWIRComm 1051 Hearing dates: 6 August 2018 Date of orders: 28 August 2018 Decision date: 28 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Commissioner Sloan Decision: The unfair dismissal application made by William James Sandilands is dismissed. Catchwords: UNFAIR DISMISSAL – criminal conduct – domestic violence – applicant a solicitor with Legal Aid – applicant concedes dismissal not unjust – whether a sufficient connection between the misconduct and the applicant's employment – regulatory context of employment considered – respondent committed to promoting awareness and prevention of domestic and family violence – applicant a senior employee – connection with employment found – legitimate for respondent to seek to protect its reputation – risk of harm to reputation – dismissal not unreasonable – factors weighing in favour of harshness considered – mitigating factors do not outweigh seriousness of applicant's misconduct – dismissal not harsh – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Government Sector Employment Act 2013 (NSW) Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Byrne & Anor v Australian Airlines Ltd [1995] HCA 24; (1995) 61 IR 32 Corrective Services NSW v Danwer [2013] NSWIRComm 61 Department of Health v Perihan Kaplan [2010] NSWIRComm 65 Hansen v Secretary of the Department of Transport – as head of the Transport Service and exercising the employer function of staff of Roads and Maritime Services [2016] NSWIRComm 1011 Outboard World Pty Limited (t/a Budget Waste Control (Sydney)) v Muir (1993) 51 IR 167 Wattie v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Justice (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 124 Western Suburbs District Ambulance Committee v Tipping [1957] AR (NSW) 273 Category: Principal judgment Parties: William James Sandilands (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate