NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pasminco Cockle Creek Smelter Pty Ltd (subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v Minister for Planning [2018] NSWLEC 130 Hearing dates: 6–8 August 2018 Date of orders: 29 August 2018 Decision date: 29 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Preston CJ Decision: The Court orders that the appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – project approval – application to modify approval – requested changes to terms of approval – land on which project carried out subdivided and some lots sold – consent of owners of subdivided lots not obtained for modification application – whether owners' consent required – no power to determine modification application Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4(1), 75A, 75B, 75J, 75K, 75W, 80A(1)(b) and (5) Environmental Assessment and Planning Regulation 2000 Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings, Transitional and Other Provisions) Regulation 2017 Sch 2 cl 3BA, Sch 4 cl 8F Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 State Environmental Planning Policy (Major Projects) 2005 Sch1 cl 28(b) Cases Cited: Platform Project Services Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning [2017] NSWLEC 102 Waverley Council v Hairis Architects (2002) 123 LGERA 100; [2002] NSWLEC 180 Windy Dropdown Pty Ltd v Warringah Council (2000) 111 LGERA 299; [2000] NSWLEC 240 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pasminco Cockle Creek Smelter Pty Ltd (subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) (Applicant) Minister for Planning (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Howard SC (Applicant) Ms J Needham SC, Ms J McKelvey (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate