NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Quintero v R; Carvajal v R; Salazar v R [2018] NSWCCA 190 Hearing dates: 2 July 2018 Date of orders: 31 August 2018 Decision date: 31 August 2018 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Schmidt J at [25] Button J at [150] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted to the applicants;
(2) Appeals upheld;
(3) Sentences imposed by Blackmore DCJ upon Ms Quintero, Ms Carvajal and Ms Salazar set aside;
(4) The applicants are resentenced as follows:
(a) Ms Quintero – sentenced to a non-parole period of 4 years imprisonment commencing on 17 September 2015, ending on 16 September 2019, with a balance of term of 1 year, 3 months expiring on 16 December 2020. Her release to parole on 16 September 2019 is recommended.
(b) Ms Carvajal – sentenced to a non-parole period of 4 years imprisonment commencing on 17 September 2015, ending on 16 September 2019, with a balance of term of 1 year, 3 months expiring on 16 December 2020. Her release to parole on 16 September 2019 is recommended.
(c) Ms Salazar – sentenced to a non-parole period of 4 years, 1 month imprisonment commencing on 17 September 2015, ending on 16 October 2019, with a balance of term of 1 year, 4 months expiring on 16 February 2021. Her release to parole on 16 October 2019 is recommended. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – appeals against sentence – four co-offenders – each applicant convicted of four offences of aggravated break, enter and steal contrary to s 112(2) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) –offences committed as part of joint criminal enterprise-character-absence of criminal record in Australia-– whether sentencing judge erred by holding applicants were disentitled to the benefit of good character – whether sentencing judge erred by failing to take into account one applicant's background of childhood deprivation – whether sentencing judge erred by failing to take into account applicant's role in the offences relevant to moral culpability – whether sentencing judge erred by finding that, despite having no criminal record, no additional leniency could be afforded given nature of offences – whether effect of delay taken into account when fixing non-parole period – assessment of subjective case – whether failure to take into account subjective features – whether special circumstances – whether one applicant has justifiable sense of grievance given sentence imposed on co-offender – whether sentence manifestly excessive – leave to appeal granted – appeals upheld – applicants resentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Bidgood v R [2016] NSWCCA 138 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321;[2000] HCA 54 HJ v R [2014] NSWCCA 21 KR v R [2012] NSWCCA 32 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179 Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v Achurch (2011) 216 A Crim R 152; [2011] NSWCCA 186 R v Chu (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 16 October 1998, unrep) R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Faneite (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 1 May 1998, unrep) R v Huang (2000) 113 A Crim R 386; [2000] NSWCCA 238 R v JW (2011) NSWLR 3; [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Levi (unreported, NSWCCA 15 May 1997) R v MJB [2014] NSWCCA 195 R v Sugahara and Watanabe (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 16 October 1998, unrep) Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267; [2001] HCA 21 Trindall v R [2013] NSWCCA 229 Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629; [2003] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mitzi Karoly Quintero Monica Yulieth Reinoso Carvajal Viridiania Guiterrz Salazar Regina Representation: Counsel: R J Wilson (Quintero) A Webb (Carvajal) J Trevallion(Salazar) H Roberts (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate