NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Naaman (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1329 Hearing dates: 2 August 2018 Date of orders: 02 August 2018 Decision date: 02 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: Orders in accordance with short minutes of order. Matter fixed for directions before List Judge Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – Preliminary hearing - application for interim supervision order - prior to release - whether defendant is an eligible offender - whether supporting documentation would justify the making of an extended supervision order - background factors - history of substance abuse, violence and psychiatric illness - breaches of parole - persecutory ideas - threats of terrorism - high degree of probability the defendant presents an unacceptable risk of committing a serious terrorism offence - safety of community - substantial agreement on suite of conditions - disagreement on internet and electronic communications - satisfied conditions are necessary Legislation Cited: Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW), ss 10, 20, 23, 25, 27, 29 Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Ceissman [2018] NSWSC 508; State of New South Wales v Elomar (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1034 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Mohamed Naaman (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Agius SC with C Melis (State of New South Wales) T Edwards (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitors for New South Wales (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2018/235779 Publication restriction: Whole of paragraph [31] and part of [38] pursuant to orders under s 66 Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) made by Bellew J on 1 August 2018.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate