NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sefian v R [2018] NSWCCA 194 Hearing dates: 20 August 2018 Date of orders: 07 September 2018 Decision date: 07 September 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Price J at [83]; Harrison J at [84] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence out of time is granted. (2) Leave to appeal is granted. (3) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – robbery in company causing grievous bodily harm and aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence – robbery involving serious injuries to householder – finding of special circumstances by sentencing judge – only small adjustment to non-parole period made – whether judge intended to make only a small adjustment – whether larger adjustment should have been made – error established – need to resentence – on resentence no lesser sentence warranted in law – sentence appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Children's (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) – s 15 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – ss 98, 105A, 112(2) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2008 (NSW) – Clause 228 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – s 44(2B) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 10(1)(b) Cases Cited: Allen v R [2015] NSWCCA 113 AM v R [2012] NSWCCA 203; 225 A Crim R 481 BR v R [2015] NSWCCA 255 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 CM v R [2013] NSWCCA 341 Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 DG v R [2017] NSWCCA 139 Heron v R [2006] NSWCCA 215 Hornhardt v R [2017] NSWCCA 186 Jiang v R [2010] NSWCCA 277 Jinnette v R [2012] NSWCCA 217 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Lehn v R [2016] NSWCCA 255 MD v R [2015] NSWCCA 37 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Ponfield [1999] NSWCCA 435; 48 NSWLR 327 Regina v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 Sabongi v R [2015] NSWCCA 25 Soames v R [2014] NSWCCA 158 Trad v R [2009] NSWCCA 56; 194 A Crim R 20 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Moustafa Sefian – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: R Wilson – Applicant D Hatfield – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate