NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zidar v Department of Justice [2018] NSWCATAD 209 Hearing dates: 4 September 2018 Date of orders: 07 September 2018 Decision date: 07 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: 1. Mr Zidar's application to use a recording device to record the case conference on 4 September 2018 is refused.
2. Mr Zidar's application for me to disqualify myself from conducting the case conference on 4 September 2018 is refused. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application to use a recording device to record a case conference – application for disqualification - apprehended bias. Legislation Cited: Court Security Act 2005 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: ALZ v SafeWork NSW (No 3) [2016] NSWCATAD 156 Attorney General of NSW v Lucy Klewer [2003] NSWCA 295 Barakat v Goritsas (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 36 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Fraud Detection and Reporting Pty Ltd v Department of Justice [2018] NSWCATAP 191 Singh v Legal Aid Commission [2014] NSWCATAD 28 Turner v Commissioner, Corrective Services NSW [2016] NSWCATAD 15 Judicial Officers Act 1986 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Joe Zidar (Applicant) Department of Justice (Respondent) Representation: J Zidar (Applicant in person)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate