NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Steven Issa v Michael Issa & Anastazija Balaz [2018] NSWSC 1387 Hearing dates: 24 July 2018 Date of orders: 23 August 2018 Decision date: 22 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Rein J Decision: See [25]-[28], [32] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Discovery – Objection to inspection – Legal professional privilege – Joint privilege – Implied waiver – Where proceedings commenced in respect of an agreement resolving proceedings commenced in 2006 ("the Agreement") – Where Second Defendant claims that the partners of the law firm responsible for drafting the Agreement breached their duty towards her – Whether Second Defendant has waived her claim of privilege over documents held by her former solicitor; HELD: Claims advanced found to be inconsistent with the claim of privilege over documents held by her former solicitor, but that privilege was a joint privilege (of both defendants) and was not implicitly waived by the First Defendant.
CIVIL PROCEDURE – Discovery – Objection to inspection – Legal professional privilege – Specific documents – Whether documents over which privilege has been claimed are privileged – Where documents are file notes of conversations between solicitors for the Defendants on the one hand, and the solicitor for the Plaintiff in earlier proceedings or a third person on the other; HELD: Such documents are not the subject of legal professional privilege. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Limited (2006) 151 FCR 341; [2006] FCAFC 86 DSE (Holdings) Pty Limited v Intertan Inc (2003) 127 FCR 499; [2003] FCA 384 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49; [1999] HCA 67 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Webb and Ors (1996) 39 NSWLR 601 Hancock v Rinehart (Privilege) [2016] NSWSC 12 Hastie Group Ltd (in liq) v Moore (2016) 339 ALR 635; [2016] NSWCA 305 Lillicrap and Another v Nalder & Son (A Firm) [1993] 1 WLR 94; [1993] 1 All ER 724 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 66 Paragon Finance Plc. (Formerly National Homeloans Corporation Plc.) and Others v Freshfields (a firm) [1999] 1 WLR 1183 Sugden v Sugden (2007) 70 NSWLR 301; [2007] NSWCA 312 Texts Cited: The Law of Privilege (Bankim Thanki QC (ed), 3rd ed, Oxford University Press, 2018) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Steven Issa (Plaintiff) Michael Issa (First Defendant/ Respondent on the Motion) Anastazija Balaz (Second Defendant/ Respondent on the Motion) Anthony Gavan, Bruce Leslie Gotterson, Suzanne Therese Hallas, John Malbon Ralston, Owen Benjamin Ratner, Neil Kenneth Simmons, Christopher Wade Sinclair, Christopher Mark Sydes (Cross Defendants/ Applicants on the Motion) Thompson Eslick Solicitors (Interested Party) Representation: Counsel: Mr R. Garland (Plaintiff) Mr B. Coles QC with Mr P. Silver (First Defendant/ Respondent on the Motion) Mr E. Hyde (Second Defendant/ Respondent on the Motion) Mr J. Emmett (Cross Defendants/ Applicants on the Motion)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate