NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Broadribb v Medical Council of New South Wales [2018] NSWCATAD 213 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 13 September 2018 Decision date: 13 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – government information – conclusive presumption of an overriding public interest against disclosure – information relating to or obtained in exercise of functions of Health Care Complaints Commission. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Health Care Complaints Act 1993 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: DF v Director General, Attorney Generals Department [2002] NSWADT 164 Pertsinidis v Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District [2014] NSWCATAD 130 Sinclair v Psychology Council of NSW [2017] NSWCATAD 8 Whyte v Medical Council of NSW [2014] NSWCATAD 190 Yee v Medical Council of NSW [2017] NSWCATAD 370 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dale Broadribb (Applicant)
Medical Council of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant Self Represented Medical Council of NSW Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00077694 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate