NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sheiman v Carpet Solutions [2018] NSWCATAP 214 Hearing dates: 3 September 2018 Date of orders: 14 September 2018 Decision date: 14 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K Rosser, Principal Member R Perrignon, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) The appeal is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: APPEALS – application to renew proceedings for rectification orders under Fair Trading Act (NSW) 1987 – leave to appeal – whether substantial miscarriage of justice – whether fresh evidence may be given on appeal Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Australian Consumer Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: None Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vladimir Sheiman - Appellant Veznard Pty Ltd t/as Carpet Solutions – Respondent Representation: Appellant: In person Respondent: Mr D Schnitzer File Number(s): AP 18/29805 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal of NSW Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 31 May 2018 Before: J Levingston, General Member File Number(s): GEN 18/16004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate