NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Webster v Strang; Steiner v Strang [No 2] [2018] NSWSC 1411 Hearing dates: 6 July 2018 Decision date: 13 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Orders for burden of additional provision not varied; stays pending appeal granted on terms Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision and maintenance – principles upon which relief granted – claim by adult children against large estate – application by beneficiaries not separately represented at earlier hearing to vary orders as to how additional provision should be borne among beneficiaries – application for stays pending appeal Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Law Act (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Chan v Chan [2016] NSWCA 222 Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 Hoobin v Hoobin [2004] NSWSC 705 Re Seer and the Testator's Family Maintenance Act (1969) 90 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 400 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Webster v Strang; Steiner v Strang [2018] NSWSC 495 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ms Robyn Gai Webster (Plaintiff, 2012/129833) Mr John Steiner (Plaintiff, 2012/185566) Mr Kenneth Ross Strang (First defendant, 2012/129833 and 2012/185566) Mr Jason Tang (Second defendant, 2012/129833 and 2012/185566) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Bilinsky (Plaintiff, 2012/129833) Mr M K Condon SC (Plaintiff, 2012/185566) Mr L Ellison SC (Defendants, 2012/129833 and 2012/185566) R.D. Wilson SC (Robyn's family) M.K. Meek SC (Lesley's family)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate