NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kwok v R [2018] NSWCCA 200 Hearing dates: 7 September 2018 Date of orders: 21 September 2018 Decision date: 21 September 2018 Before: Ward JA at [1] Bellew J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [67] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Accumulation of sentences – Where applicant appeared for sentence in respect of separate counts of manufacturing a prohibited drug and supplying a prohibited drug – Where the sentencing judge ordered partial accumulation – Where applicant argued that sentences ought to have been wholly concurrent because one offence comprehended the other – Separate and distinct offending – Partial accumulation within the proper exercise of sentencing discretion – No error established
CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Parity – Whether applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance in light of sentence imposed on a co-offender – Where the findings of the sentencing judge as to the greater role played by the applicant in comparison with that co-offender were warranted on the evidence – No error established
CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Parity – Whether applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance in light of sentence imposed upon a co-offender – Where that co-offender had asked the sentencing judge to take into account an additional offence – Where the submissions made on behalf of the applicant attempted to estimate the percentage of the sentence imposed which was referable to the additional offence – Such approach contrary to principle and authority – No error established Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General's application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure Act) 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v KMD [2015] VSCA 255; (2015) 254 A Crim R 244 Green v R; Quinn v R (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Lowe v R (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Postiglione v R (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v Lamella [2014] NSWCCA 122 Wan v R [2017] NSWCCA 261 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yuk Ho Kwok – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: G Wendler – Applicant L Crowley – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate