NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kadsielski v Guca 1 Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATAP 223 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 19 September 2018 Decision date: 19 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R C Titterton, Principal Member Decision: The respondent's application for costs is dismissed. Catchwords: COSTS – special circumstances – where application dismissed as misconceived – exercise of discretion – no costs awarded Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Brunsprop Pty Ltd v Joanne Hay & Wes Davies [2015] NSWCATAP 152 Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 CPD Holdings Pty Ltd t/as The Bathroom Exchange v Baguley [2015] NSWCATAP 21 Durran t/a Canberra Sheds and Outdoor Storage v Bliss [2018] NSWCATAP 43 eMove Pty Ltd v Naomi Dickinson [2015] NSWCATAP 94 Gizah Pty Limited v AXA Trustees Limited (No. 2) [2001] NSWADT 164 Ingate v Andrews [2018] NSWCATAP 170 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 The Owners - Strata Plan No. 47027 v Peter Clisdell Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2018] NSWCATAP 46 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Stanislaw Leon Kadsielski, Applicant Guca 1 Pty Ltd, Respondent Representation: There was no appearance by the Applicant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate