NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 17) [2018] NSWSC 1420 Hearing dates: 14 September 2018 Date of orders: 14 September 2018 Decision date: 14 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: MSC.010.286.0001 admitted save for the second paragraph under the heading "Emergency procedure" on 0028 and the passages under the heading "Operational decisions" on page 0034. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – documentary evidence - business record – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 69, 77-81, 135 Cases Cited: Capital Securities XV Pty Ltd (formerly known as Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd v Calleja [2018] NSWCA 26 Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Limited [2000] FCA 406 Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 244 CLR 342; [2011] HCA 36 Roche v Page [2003] NSWSC 939 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater (First Defendant) SunWater Limited (Second Defendant) State of Queensland (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Sexton SC; N Owens SC; R Yezerski; J Taylor (Plaintiff) A Pomerenke QC; D Klineberg (First Defendant) D Williams SC; HJA Neal; N Simpson (Second Defendant) GA Thompson QC; JM Horton QC; E Morzone (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate