NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Forte Sydney Construction v Lin Betty Building Group [2018] NSWSC 1429 Hearing dates: 19 September 2018 Date of orders: 19 September 2018 Decision date: 19 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: McDougall J Decision: Summons dismissed with costs. Money in court to be paid out to first defendant. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act – application to quash adjudicator's determination – where payment schedule provided after the statutory time limit – where claimant subsequently gave notice of its intention to apply for adjudication – where no payment schedule provided after that notice was given – whether the earlier payment schedule was a valid payment schedule – whether the adjudicator fulfilled his statutory functions – summons dismissed. Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Chase Oyster Bar Pty Limited v Hamo Industries Pty Limited (2010) 78 NSWLR 393 Coordinated Construction Co Pty Limited v J M Hargreaves (NSW) Pty Limited (2005) 63 NSWLR 385 Falgat Constructions Pty Limited v Equity Australia Corporation Pty Limited (2007) 23 BCL 292 Rojo Building Pty Limited v Jillcris Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 309 Taylor Projects Group Pty Limited v Brick Dept Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 439 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Forte Sydney Construction Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Lin Betty Building Group Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Callum Campbell (Second Defendant) Adjudicate Today Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: I G Roberts SC (Plaintiff) F P Hicks SC (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate