NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Golden Goal Pty Limited v Dapto Bowling Club Limited (in liquidation) [2018] NSWSC 1431 Hearing dates: 18 September 2018 Decision date: 18 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Black J Decision: The Plaintiff's claim for an order extending a caveat in its original form or for leave to lodge a caveat in an alternative form is dismissed. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – caveats – application to extend operation of caveat under s 74K of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) – where lessee lodged a caveat claiming equitable interest in land arising from lease – where liquidator of lessor disclaimed lease – where no application for leave to set aside the disclaimer had to date been made – whether seriously arguable case for proprietary interest arising from the lease.
REAL PROPERTY – caveats – application to lodge further caveat under s 74O of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) – where lease granted lessee contractual rights – whether unconscionable that lessee will be left to prove for debt in the lessor's liquidation – whether seriously arguable case that lessee has a proprietary interest in the land. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 471B, 500, 568E - Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) ss 74K, 74L, 74O Cases Cited: - Bayblu Holdings Pty Ltd v Capital Finance Australia Ltd [2011] NSWCA 39 - Commonwealth v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39; (1990) 170 CLR 394 - Delaforce v Simpson-Cook [2010] NSWCA 84; (2010) 78 NSWLR 483 - Martyn v Glennan [1979] 2 NSWLR 234 - McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission [1951] HCA 79; (1951) 84 CLR 377 - Morkaya v Parkinson [2010] NSWSC 596 - Morris v Morris [1982] 1 NSWLR 61 - Pennie v Pennie [2010] NSWSC 565 - Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HR 129 - Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 76 ALR 513 - Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Ltd (recs and mgrs apptd) (in liq) (2013) 251 CLR 592 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Golden Goal Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Dapto Bowling Club Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Philips (Plaintiff) J Emmett (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate