Anderson v University of Sydney (No 2) [2018] NSWCATAD 225

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Anderson v University of Sydney (No 2) [2018] NSWCATAD 225 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 24 September 2018 Decision date: 24 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J McAteer Senior Member Decision: (1) A hearing in respect of the application under s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) is dispensed with under s 50(2) of that Act.

(2) I direct the Registrar:

(a) to alter the text of the reasons for decision and orders made on 27 August 2018 by inserting in order 4:

(i) "That document is to be released with the following redacted from the email contained within document 24: the 10th, 11th and 12th words of paragraph 2 (redacted), the second sentence of paragraph 3 (redacted), paragraph 4 (redacted) and paragraph 5 (redacted)."

(3) I direct the Registrar:

(a) To alter the text of the reasons for decision and orders made on 27 August 2018 by inserting at the conclusion of paragraph 92 the following words:

(i) "As document 27 is captured by document 28 this finding also applies to document 27." Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE law – amendment – slip rule – inconsistency between stated reasons and orders – intention of decision maker – whether omission critical to reasons Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Uniform Civil procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Anderson v University of Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 196 Place v Department of Finance, Services and Innovation (No 2) [2017] NSWCATAD 21 Rekrut and Scott v Champion Homes Sales Pty Ltd; Champion Homes Sales Pty ltd v Rekrut and Scott (No 2) [2018] NSWCATAP 64 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Tim Anderson (Applicant) University of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Tronson - Respondent