NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tylan Brown [2018] NSWDC 265 Hearing dates: 18 May 2018 Date of orders: 18 May 2018 Decision date: 18 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Sentence: Aggregate sentence 4 years 3 months. Non parole period 2 years 9 months Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW SENTENCING – an unexplained shooting – benefit of acquittal – parity principles – impact on community – victim impact – personal harm – need for circumspection – totality – custody has not deterred – intellectual disability – special circumstances – community interest in rehabilitation – circumspection when considering victim impact statements - Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: BP v R (2010) 201 A CRIM R 379 DPP v De Le Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Engert v R (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 Johnson v R [2010] NSWCCA 124 KT [2008] NSWCCA 51; 182 A CRIM R 571 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Texts Cited: Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council in 2011: Does Imprisonment Deter? A Review of the Evidence Category: Sentence Parties: Jesse John Rose (Offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr D Pace, Trial advocate (for the offender)
Solicitors: Ms E Parkes (for the offender) Ms J Walshe (for the Director of Public Prosecutions) File Number(s): 2017/00039674
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate