NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Palmerston Dragon No 1 Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2018] NSWLEC 1499 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 20 September 2018 Date of orders: 20 September 2018 Decision date: 20 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: See [4] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Palmerston Dragon No 1 Pty Ltd (Applicant) Georges River Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T To (Applicant) Dr S Berveling (Respondent)
Solicitors: Mills Oakley (Applicant) Georges River Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/217105 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. Leave is granted for the Applicant to rely on the amended plans, drawings and documents as referred to in the conditions of consent at Annexure A and included at Annexure B. 2. The appeal is upheld. 3. Development Application DA9/2017/112/1 for the construction of a residential flat building comprising fifty one (51) residential dwellings and six (6) serviced apartments over three (3) levels of basement parking for sixty three (63) car parking spaces at 2 – 10 Palmerston Street, Kogarah is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A. 4. The Clause 4.6 request prepared by Planning Ingenuity with reference 0129/18 and dated 10 September 2018 is upheld. 5. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, in the amount of $84,000 on or before 30 November 2018. All previous costs orders in the proceedings are set aside. ………………………. Sarah Bish Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (474 KB, pdf) Annexure B (19.0 MB, pdf)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate