NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: PSEC Project Services Pty Ltd v Kiama Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1501 Hearing dates: 17 September 2018 Date of orders: 27 September 2018 Decision date: 27 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. 10.2016.231.1 and rely upon the amended plans in the table at [99(1)]. (2) The Appeal is upheld. (3) Development Application No. 10.2016.231.1 for the demolition of existing structures, tree removal and the construction of a 4 storey residential flat building containing 16 x 3 bedroom units over one and a half levels of basement car parking, with a total of 40 car parking spaces (8 visitor and 32 residential, 4 of which are accessible), on the land legally described as Lot 1 DP 309656, Lot 1 DP 176929, Lot 2 DP 774101 and Lot 3 DP 774101 with a street address of 15-17 Bourrool Lane, Kiama, is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A. (4) No orders as to costs. (5) Exhibits 1, 3, 6, 7 and 8 are returned. Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – residential flat building – consent orders – objections raised by residents – height, bulk and scale – streetscape – amenity and safety – overshadowing – view loss – car parking – capacity of laneway Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Kiama Local Environmental Plan 2011 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Practice Note - Class 1 Development Appeals State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65—Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development State Environmental Planning Policy No 71—Coastal Protection State Environmental Planning Policy No 55—Remediation of Land Cases Cited: Tenacity Consulting v Waringah [2004] NSWLEC 140 Texts Cited: Kiama Development Control Plan 2012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: PSEC Project Services Pty Ltd (Applicant) Kiama Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Wauchope, Solicitor (Applicant) A Seton, Solicitor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate