NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v Tran [2018] NSWCA 215 Hearing dates: 13 July 2018 Decision date: 28 September 2018 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Emmett AJA at [91]; Bellew J at [105] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal;
2. Appeal allowed;
3. Set aside the orders of Norton SC DCJ made on 23 November 2017;
4. Judgment for the appellant;
5. The respondent to pay the costs of the appeal and in the court below;
6. Direct the appellant to inform the Court of the course she wishes to take in relation to the recovery of monies paid to the respondent. Catchwords: TORTS – Negligence – Motor vehicle accident – whether primary judge erred in accepting evidence that the respondent was in the car at the time of the accident – whether fact finding process of primary judge miscarried Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss128, 140 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 83, 117, 118 Motor Accidents Injuries Bill 2017 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A, 101 Cases Cited: Antoun v Chidiac [2017] NSWDC 208 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd [1995] NSWCA 69 Dearman v Dearman (1908) 7 CLR 549; [1908] HCA 84 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472; [1993] HCA 78 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 310 ALR 1; [2014] HCA 26 Insurance Australia Ltd v Checchia (2011) 80 NSWLR 1; [2011] NSWCA 101 Lee v NSW Crime Commission (2012) 224 A Crim R 94; [2012] NSWCA 262 Murray v Sheldon Commercial Interiors Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 77 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 110 ALR 449; [1992] HCA 66 New South Wales v Hathaway [2010] NSWCA 184 Nominal Defendant v Smith (2015) 73 MVR 257; [2015] NSWCA 339 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531; [1979] HCA 9 Texts Cited: Explanatory Note to the Motor Accidents Compensation Bill 1999 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thi Thuy Tien Nguyen (Appellant) Van Nam Tran (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Rewell SC (Appellant) L King SC; J Trainor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate