NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Peric v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1509 Hearing dates: 10 September 2018 Date of orders: 08 October 2018 Decision date: 08 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: The orders of the Court are: (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) Development Application No. DA/687/2017 for demolition of an existing dwelling, garage and shed, Torrens title subdivision of the land into two lots, and construction of two semi-detached dwellings with garages and associated landscaping and fencing is determined by refusal; (3) The exhibits are returned, with the exception of Exhibits A, B and 1. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Torrens title subdivision of land – minimum subdivision lot area development standard – whether the Applicants' environmental planning grounds are sufficient to uphold a cl 4.6 written request under RLEP Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Randwick Local Environment Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWCA 248 Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90 Gabriel Stefanidis v Randwick City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1307 Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Council [2018] NSWLEC 118 Randwick City Council v Micaul Holdings Ltd (2016) 225 LGERA 94; [2016] NSWLEC 7 Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446; [2007] NSWLEC 827 Texts Cited: Randwick Development Control Plan 2012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mirko Peric (First Applicant) Jovan Davidovic (Second Applicant) Randwick City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Eastman (Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate