NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zidar v Department of Justice (No 3) [2018] NSWCATAD 230 Hearing dates: 14 June 2018 Date of orders: 02 October 2018 Decision date: 02 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Government information - excluded information – conclusive presumption against disclosure - legal professional privilege - complaints handling, investigative and reporting functions. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Amos v Central Coast Council [2018] NSWCATAD 101 Battin v University of New England [2013] NSWADT 73 BNQ v South Eastern Sydney Local Health District [2015] NSWCATAD 156 Camilleri v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2012] NSWADT 5 Fraud Detection & Reporting Pty Ltd v Department of Justice [2018] NSWCATAD 63 Fraud Detection and Reporting Pty Ltd v Department of Justice [2018] NSWCATAP 191 Peter Zonnevylle v Department of Education and Communities [2018] NSWCATAD 139 Robinson v Commissioner of Police [2014] NSWCATAP 73 Singh v Legal Aid Commission (No 2) [2015] NSWCATAD 5 Zidar v Department of Justice (No 2) [2018] NSWCATAD 214 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joe Zidar (Applicant) Department of Justice (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Birch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate