NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Greentree v R [2018] NSWCCA 227 Hearing dates: 5 September 2018 Date of orders: 17 October 2018 Decision date: 17 October 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] McCallum J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [3] Decision: (1) The application for leave to appeal be granted;
(2) The appeal be allowed;
(3) Set aside the sentence imposed by Buscombe DCJ on 7 December 2016;
(4) In lieu thereof:
(a) impose an aggregate sentence of eight years' imprisonment to commence on 8 April 2016 and expire on 7 April 2024;
(b) pursuant to s 44(2A) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 set a non-parole period of 5 years and 6 months;
(c) specify that the earliest date the applicant will be eligible to be released on parole is 7 October 2021;
(d) pursuant to s 53A(2)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, indicate to the applicant and record that an aggregate sentence is imposed and that the sentence that would have been imposed for count 1 on the indictment is imprisonment for 6 years and 3 months with a non-parole period of 4 years and 5 months, for count 2 on the indictment the sentence that would have been imposed is 2 years and 5 months with a non-parole period of 1 year and 8 months and for count 3 on the indictment the sentence that would have been imposed is 2 years and 1 month imprisonment. Catchwords: SENTENCING – take part in manufacture of commercial quantity of amphetamine – finding of objective seriousness – sentencing judge wrongly assumed commercial quantity was 500 grams when it was 1 kg at time of offence – whether sentencing judge failed to address factors re assistance – re‑sentence – whether Court can receive further evidence concerning family circumstances – relevance and weight of that evidence – applicant re‑sentenced. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 10, 21A, 23, 32, 44, 53A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 193B, 350 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 24 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Amendment (Methylamphetamine) Regulation 2015 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 7, 7A, 36 Cases Cited: Betts v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 420; [2016] HCA 25; Carter v R [2018] NSWCCA 138 Delaney v R; R v Delaney [2013] NSWCCA 150 DL v The Queen [2018] HCA 32 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 King v R [2010] NSWCCA 202 Kremesis v The Queen [2016] NSWCCA 257 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Girard, Andrew John, R v Girard, Tessa Maree [2004] NSWCCA 170 R v Grbin [2004] NSWCCA 220 R v Hunt; Ex parte Sean Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 180 CLR 322; [1979] HCA 232 R v Mills (2005) 154 A Crim R 40 R v X [2004] NSWCCA 93 R v XX [2017] NSWCCA 90 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Scott Peter Greentree (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: D Barrow (Applicant) M England (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate