NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Leda Holdings Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2018] NSWLEC 1547 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 12 October 2018 Date of orders: 12 October 2018 Decision date: 12 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leda Holdings Pty Ltd (Applicant) Bayside Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: McLellan, Madison Marcus Law Firm (Applicant) A Epstein, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/371046 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans being those documents listed in Annexure 'A'. 2. Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay the Council's costs thrown away as a result of amending the application in the amount of $20,000 within 28 days of this order. 3. The appeal is upheld. 4. Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 2017/1126 (as amended) for the following development on Lot 471 in DP752015, known as 13-19 Baker Street, Banksmeadow: 1. demolition of the existing factory buildings; 2. construction of a new 2-storey building, comprising: twenty-six (26) warehouse units, with loading bays and ancillary mezzanine office areas; 3. seventy-four (74) secure self-storage spaces; 4. one hundred and twenty-six (126) car parking spaces; 5. landscaping; and 6. strata subdivision. 1. Development consent is granted subject to the Conditions set out in Annexure 'B', Plans in Annexure 'C' (architectural plans, landscaping plans and stormwater management plans), and draft Strata Subdivision Plans in Annexure 'D'. ………………………. M Chilcott Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (25.5 KB, pdf) Annexure B (227 KB, pdf) Annexure C Architecture Plans (9.26 MB, pdf) Annexure C Landscape Plans (4.28 MB, pdf) Annexure C Stormwater Management Plans (3.42 MB, pdf) Annexure D Draft Strata Plans (1.22 MB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 15 October 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate