NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kupang Resources Ltd (subject to Deed Of Company Arrangement) v Elias [2018] NSWSC 1553 Hearing dates: 12 October 2018 Date of orders: 12 October 2018 Decision date: 12 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Parker J Decision: See [48] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications – security for costs order – quantum of security – whether estimate of costs in the preparation and hearing of the matter involve an unnecessary level of expense – estimate of costs where legal practitioner acting for the applicant practises in State with no formal division between counsel and solicitor
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications – security for costs order – quantum of security – estimating costs where there is uncertainty in the conduct of proceedings – discretion of the Court to order security be furnished in tranches – discretion of Court to make an order granting leave to apply to adjust quantum of security to reflect the actual level of expenditure on costs
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications – security for costs order – quantum of security – whether the quantum of a cost order in the present case can be set-off by a cost order incurred in a previous, related matter – discretion to set-off cost orders under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335(1) – discretion not exercised where the cost order in the previous, related matter was awarded on a joint and several basis – discretion not exercised where the Court must make an assessment of the tax liability on cost order awarded in the previous, related matter Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335(1) Cases Cited: Armstrong Scalisi Holdings Pty Ltd v Piscopo (Trustee), Re Collins [2017] FCA 423 Procon (GB) Ltd v Provincial Building Co Ltd [1984] 2 All ER 368 Re Hodgkinson (2017) 15 ABC(NS) 483; [2017] FCA 1342 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Kupang Resources Ltd (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) (Plaintiff) Antony William Paul Sage (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: AM Hochroth (Plaintiff/Respondent) NM Bender (Second Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate