NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zhu v TAFE NSW [2018] NSWCATAD 243 Hearing dates: 2 October 2018 Date of orders: 17 October 2018 Decision date: 17 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Scahill, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave is refused for the applicant's complaint of race, discrimination to proceed. (2) Leave is refused for the applicant's complaint of aiding and abetting to proceed Catchwords: ANTI-DISCRIMINATION - leave sought to proceed with declined complaint - allegation of race discrimination by student against TAFE- whether fair and just for complaint to proceed – no basis on which an inference can be drawn that race was a reason for any of the alleged conduct; complaint of aiding and abetting discrimination Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Cases Cited: A v Director-General, Department Education and Training [2008] NSWSC 1091
Coomaraswamy v Campbelltown Anglican Schools Council [2015] NSWCATAD 271
Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133
Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143
Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness [2000] NSWCA 29; (2000) 49 NSWLR 262
Shvetsova v State of New South Wales (Department of Education and Communities) [2012] NSWADT 253
State of New South Wales v Whiteoak [2014] NSWCATAP 99 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Yan Zhu (Applicant) TAFE NSW (First Respondent) Tresillian Family Care Centres (Second Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant Self Represented Minter Ellison (First Respondent) Stevens and Associates (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00272812 Publication restriction: N/A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate