NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Edward Ted Lakis and Anor v Michael Victor Lardis and Anor (No 4) [2018] NSWSC 1566 Hearing dates: 28 September 2018 Decision date: 19 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Sackar J Decision: see paras [53]-[55] Catchwords: COSTS – appropriate principles and considerations – lump sum or gross costs order – whether lump sum costs order should be made – whether unnecessary ex parte application for freezing orders should affect appropriate discount to lump sum or gross costs order Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: Edward Ted Lakis v Michael Victor Lardis [2017] NSWSC 321 Edward Ted Lakis v Michael Victor Lardis [2017] NSWSC 561 Edward Ted Lakis v Michael Victor Lardis (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 1296 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2007] NSWSC 23 Lardis v Lakis [2018] NSWCA 113 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Thomas A Edison Ltd v Bullock (1912) 15 CLR 679; [1912] HCA 72 Walter Rau Neusser Oel Und Fett AG v Cross Pacific Trading Ltd [2005] FCA 955 Texts Cited: n/a Category: Costs Parties: Edward Ted Lakis (First Plaintiff) Amazon Pest Control Pty Ltd (in liq) ACN 092 833 531 (Second Plaintiff)
Michael Victor Lardis (First Defendant) Athena Lardis (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Sheller (Plaintiffs) B DeBuse (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate