NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Law Society of New South Wales v Feeney [2018] NSWCATOD 172 Hearing dates: 10 August 2018 Date of orders: 19 October 2018 Decision date: 19 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: S Westgarth, Deputy President M Sindler, Senior Member M Bolt, General Member Decision: The Tribunal having found that the Respondent has engaged in professional misconduct orders that:
(1) The name of Judy Anne Feeney be removed from the roll; and
(2) Judy Anne Feeney pay the costs of the Applicant as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: Professional misconduct – acknowledgment – contrition – external stressors – references Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Legal Profession Act 2004 Legal Profession Regulation 2005 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 Cases Cited: Allinson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration [1894] 1 QB 750 Dupal v The Law Society Of New South Wales [1990] NSWCA 56 Kumar v Legal Services Commissioner [2015] NSWCA 161 Law Society of New South Wales v Mattila (No 2) [2018] NSWCATOD 91 Law Society of NSW v Shehadie [2016] NSWCATOD 46 Law Society v Walsh [1997] NSWCA 185 Re Legal Practitioners Act 1989 to 1936; Re Parbury (Supreme Court of New South Wales of Appeal, unreported, 1 May 1989) Re Melvey; ex parte Law Society of New South Wales (1966) 85 WN (Pt1) NSW 289 at 298 Re Parbury (Supreme Court of New South Wales of Appeal, unreported, 1 May 1989) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Law Society of New South Wales (Applicant) Judy Anne Feeney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P A Madigan (Applicant) S Stanton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate