NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Louie [2019] NSWSC 54 Hearing dates: 31 January 2019 Date of orders: 11 February 2019 Decision date: 11 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) District Court proceedings No 2016/284203 between Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Louie are to be transferred to this Court pursuant to s 140(1) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).
(2) These proceedings between Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Louie are to be transferred to the Supreme Court of Victoria pursuant to s 5(2) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW).
(3) Costs are reserved. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – cross-vesting legislation – whether proceedings should be transferred to the Supreme Court of Victoria – interests of justice Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 140(1) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 12 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW), s 5(2) Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW), s 8 Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic) Cases Cited: Allan v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited [2018] NSWSC 177 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd v Lonergan [2018] VSC 357 Bankinvest AG v Seabrook (1988) 14 NSWLR 711 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd & Anor v Hague [2018] VSC 406 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Rathbone [2017] NSWSC 1547 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Burkett (Case No 2016/56666) Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Tulloch (unreported) Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Ratana [2018] NSWSC 1227 BHP Biliton Limited v Schultz [2004] HCA 61; (2004) 221 CLR 400 Bioag Pty Ltd v Hickey [2007] NSWSC 296 Byrne v Javeline Asset Management Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 214 James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Barry (2000) 50 NSWLR 357 Monash IVF Pty Limited v Burmeister (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 903 Taurus Funds Management Pty Ltd v Aurox Resources Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1223 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited (Plaintiff) Jeffrey Louie (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: DF Elliott (Plaintiff) EA Walker (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate