NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fell v Chenhall [2018] NSWSC 1574 Hearing dates: 29 May 2018 Decision date: 22 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. (3) The plaintiff, Mr Fell, must pay the costs of the proceedings of the first defendant, Ms Chenhall. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal from the Local Court – commencement of summary proceedings – no leave of Registrar sought to file Court Attendance Notices in registry other than listed registry – whether failure to comply with rule 8.7 of the Local Court Rules 2009 (NSW) leads to invalidation of the commencement of proceedings – relevance of limitation period – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 53(3)(b) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) Local Court Rules 2009 (NSW), r 8.7 Cases Cited: Blight v Inspector Barber [2007] NSWSC 448 Knaggs v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCA 83, (2007) 170 A Crim R 366 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 R v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 281, (2005) 64 NSWLR 10 Sharman v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2006] NSWSC 135; (2006) 161 A Crim R 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Mark Fell (Plaintiff) Jennifer Chenhall (First defendant) Local Court of NSW (Second defendant) Representation: Counsel: DA Buchanan SC (Plaintiff) KH Averre (First defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate