NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jafary v R [2018] NSWCCA 243 Hearing dates: 10 October 2018 Decision date: 29 October 2018 Before: Leeming JA; Walton J; Wilson J Decision: 1. Extend time to appeal to 29 June 2018.
2. Grant leave to appeal.
3. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – unreasonable verdict – appellant charged with seven counts of sexual offences – jury returned verdicts of guilty on two counts and not guilty on remaining five – whether jury's verdicts were inconsistent – whether rational explanation for acquittals – whether complainant's evidence incapable of sustaining convictions – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(2), 61N, 66C(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5(1)(b), 6(1) Cases Cited: MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 MG v R [2017] NSWCCA 14 Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454; [1987] HCA 50 R v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 38; [2016] HCA 35 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v Stone, unreported, 13 December 1954 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 TK v R (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Samad Ali Jafary (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I McLachlan (Appellant) E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate