NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sze Tu v Jam Studios Pty Ltd; Jam Studios Pty Ltd v Sze Tu (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1611 Hearing dates: 16-18 and 24 October 2017 Date of orders: 25 October 2018 Decision date: 25 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: The Court makes the following orders:
(1) Judgment for the plaintiffs against the second defendant for possession of the premises comprising that part of Lot 2367 in Deposited Plan 730219 known as Shop 5, 42-44 Queen Street, Campbelltown, New South Wales.
(2) The plaintiffs have leave to issue a writ of possession forthwith.
(3) Judgment for the plaintiffs against the second defendant in the sum of $207,972.82.
(4) The second defendant shall pay the costs of the plaintiffs of the proceedings as agreed or, in default, as assessed. Catchwords: POSSESSION OF LAND – rental arrears – mesne profits – interest payable – money judgment in favour of the plaintiff
COSTS – Calderbank offer – application for indemnity costs against a self-represented litigant – no evidence of whether self-represented litigant's non-acceptance of offer was unreasonable – costs awarded on an ordinary basis. Cases Cited: Bhagat v Global Custodians Ltd [2002] FCAFC 51 Bunnings Group Ltd v CHEP Australia Ltd (2001) 82 NSWLR 420; [2001] NSWCA 324 Love v Victoria (No 2) [2009] VSC 531 Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney Local Health District; Sydney Local Health District v Macquarie Health Corporation Ltd (No 10) [2016] NSWSC 1587 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd (No 8) [2006] FCA 1537 Sze Tu v Jam Studios Pty Ltd; Jam Studios Pty Ltd v Sze Tu [2018] NSWSC 868 Thomas v Holmes (No 3) [2017] NSWLEC 156 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Margaret Sze Tu (First Plaintiff / First Cross-Defendant) Shiu How Sze Tu (Second Plaintiff / Second Cross-Defendant) Shiu Shing Sze Tu (Third Plaintiff / Third Cross-Defendant) Helen Sze Tu (Fourth Plaintiff / Fourth Cross-Defendant) C H Real Estate Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Jam Studios Pty Ltd (Second Defendant / Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: R P V Carey (Plaintiffs / Cross-Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate