NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Al Maha Pty Limited v Coplin [2018] NSWSC 1623 Hearing dates: 22 October 2018 Date of orders: 24 October 2018 Decision date: 24 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Real Property List Before: Kunc J Decision: Option validly exercised; specific performance ordered; cross summons dismissed; defendant to pay plaintiffs' costs Catchwords: LAND LAW — Conveyancing — Options — Call options — Construction — Notice of exercise of option able to be given to grantor's conveyancer — Whether option validly exercised by notice given to conveyancer no longer retained by grantor at time of purported exercise
EQUITY — Equitable remedies — Specific performance — Set off — Court's power to order legal costs owing by vendor to be set off against purchase price Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Al Maha Pty Ltd v Coplin [2017] NSWCA 318 Cherry v Steele-Park [2017] NSWCA 295 Coplin v Al Maha Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1745 Fussell v Deigan [2018] NSWSC 1419 Goldsbrough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn (1910) 10 CLR 674 Lahoud v Lahoud [2012] NSWSC 284 Miller v DPP [2004] NSWCA 249 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd & Anor (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Pratt & Anor v Hawkins (No 2) (1991) NSW Conv55-592 Thomas Developments Pty Ltd v Setlee Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 816; 11 BPR 20,495 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Al Maha Pty Ltd ABN 71118230087 (First Plaintiff) Sophia Norma Bechara (Second Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate