NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Dillon (Final) [2018] NSWSC 1626 Hearing dates: 10 August 2018 Date of orders: 26 October 2018 Decision date: 26 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: In order to facilitate the disposition of the matter the State shall file and serve short minutes of order, reflecting this judgment, within 7 days of the publication of this judgment. The defendant shall either confirm the order proposed by the State or submit an alternative form of order within 14 days of the publication of this judgment. The Court will then make orders administratively in Chambers. Catchwords: CIVIL – application pursuant to the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – serious sex offence –application for a further extended supervision order – whether the defendant is a supervised offender –whether the defendant poses an unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence – consideration of factors in s 9 – extended supervision order made for 3 years – conditions imposed – directions Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Amendment Act 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Steadman [2016] NSWSC 174 Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Ali [2010] NSWSC 1045 State of New South Wales v Amohanga [2015] NSWSC 875 State of New South Wales v Banks [2016] NSWSC 926 State of New South Wales v Brookes (Final) [2017] NSWSC 215 State of New South Wales v Bugmy [2017] NSWSC 855 State of New South Wales v Burns [2014] NSWSC 1014 State of New South Wales v Conway [2011] NSWSC 925 State of New South Wales v Darrego [2011] NSWSC 1449 State of New South Wales v Dillon [2018] NSWSC 780 State of New South Wales v Fernando [2016] NSWSC 1665 State of New South Wales v French (Final) [2017] NSWSC 1475 State of New South Wales v Green (Final) [2013] NSWSC 1003 State of New South Wales v TT (Preliminary) [2017] NSWSC 1797 The State of New South Wales v Dillon [2016] NSWSC 256 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) James Gilbert Scott Dillon (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Aitken (Plaintiff) T Edwards (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate