Hollamby v Health Care Complaints Commission [2018] NSWCATOD 176

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hollamby v Health Care Complaints Commission [2018] NSWCATOD 176 Hearing dates: 2 August 2018 (14 September, final submissions) Date of orders: 30 October 2018 Decision date: 30 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member K Eyre, Senior Member C Anderson, Senior Member B Seth, General Member Decision: (1) The application for review is dismissed. (2) The respondent is to pay the costs of the respondent as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: TRADES AND PROFESSION –– reinstatement of health practitioner under Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Ameisen v Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSWCATOD 49 Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Hollamby [2016] NSWCATOD 91 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Lindsay v Health Care Complaints Commission [2010] NSWCA 19 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; 193 CLR 72 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Texts Cited: I. Jáuregui-Lobera, Iron deficiency and cognitive functions in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Volume 10, 2014 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michelle Hollamby (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant Self Represented N Evans (Respondent)