NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Whitehall v Oxborough [2018] NSWDC 315 Hearing dates: 4 October 2018 Date of orders: 04 October 2018 Decision date: 04 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) On the application of the defendant, these proceedings are stood over to the Defamation List on Thursday 1 November 2018. (2) Stand over the notice to produce issued by the defendant and the capacity and form challenges to the imputations to 1 November 2018. (3) Costs reserved. Catchwords: TORT – defamation – application by defendant for form and capacity rulings on imputations – defendant issues notice to produce for court documents in Supreme Court proceedings where the defendant is a party – interim non-publication orders made in the Supreme Court pending an urgent hearing – whether interim orders prevent the hearing of the argument on imputations and/or the production of documents under the notice to produce – applications adjourned pending further Supreme Court orders Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 28.2 Cases Cited: Al Muderis v Duncan (No 4) [2018] NSWSC 925 Bennette v Cohen (2005) 64 NSWLR 81 Bennette v Cohen (2007) Aust Torts Reports 81-897 Bennette v Cohen [2009] NSWCA 60 Calabro v Zappia (2010) 11 DCLR (NSW) 12 Capilano Honey Ltd v Mulvany (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 767 Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Whitehall [2018] NSWSC 1345 Craven v Globe Valley Pty Ltd [2018] QDC 155 Fastbet Investments Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2018] FCA 1418 Huang v Zhi [2018] VCC 529 Inserve Australia Ltd v Kinane [2018] QCA 116 Marshall v Smith [2013] WASC 432 Mowen v Rockhampton Regional Council [2018] QSC 192 Mowen v State of Queensland [2018] QSC 183 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Shane Dowling (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 784 Sali v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 2) [2013] VSC 719 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Nathaniel John Whitehall Defendant: Terry Oxborough Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr N J Whitehall (in person) Defendant: Mr B Goldsmith (solicitor)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate