NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tu v Chang (No. 2) [2018] NSWDC 316 Hearing dates: 25 October 2018 Date of orders: 25 October 2018 Decision date: 29 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Strike out the defence of justification to imputation 3(e). (2) Amended defence in 7 days deleting the defence of justification to imputation 3(e). (3) Defendants pay plaintiff's costs of and incidental to this application on an indemnity basis. (4) The defendants' category of discovery documents by 8 November 2018. (5) Matter stood over to the Defamation List on Thursday 15 November 2018. Catchwords: TORT – defamation – defendants justify one of five imputations but provide particulars acknowledged to be deficient despite three successive pleadings – whether defence of justification should be struck out – whether leave to amend should be granted – defence struck out without leave to replead being permitted Legislation Cited: Associations Incorporation Act 2009 (NSW), ss 30A, 33 and 40 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56 – 62 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 26, 30, 31 and 33 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 14.28 Cases Cited: Brooks v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1331 Church of the New Faith Inc v Bower (1977) 18 SASR 554 Crosby v Kelly [2013] FCA 1343 Devereaux v Clarke & Co [1891] 2 QB 582 Hickinbotham v Leach (1842) 152 ER 510 Hyer v Cabbie Pty Limited and Another [2007] NSWSC 795 Kingsfield Holdings Pty Ltd v Sullivan Commercial Pty Ltd [2013] WASC 347 Minus v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 191 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 357 Sims v Wran [1984] 1 NSWLR 317 Vakras v Cripps [2015] VSCA 193 Wing v Australian Broadcasting Corp [2018] FCA 1340 Wing v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (2017) 255 FCR 61 Wootton v Sievier [1913] 3 KB 499 Zierenberg v Labouchere [1893] 2 QB 183 Texts Cited: Brown on Defamation in Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and the United States (Thomson Reuters) Tobin & Sexton, Australian Defamation Law and Practice (LexisNexis) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Zhen Tu First Defendant: Qing Chang (known as Juliette Chang) Second Defendant: Chaohui Cui Fifth Defendant: Mingwu Jin Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr R Potter Defendants: Mr W Calokerinos
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate