NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Koropachinsky v Wang [2018] NSWDC 318 Hearing dates: 20 and 29 August 2018 Date of orders: 28 September 2018 Decision date: 28 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff for $178,993.49. (2) Defendants pay plaintiff's costs. (3) Liberty to restore in relation to interest and costs. (4) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: MOTOR VEHICLE – claim for $178,993.49 for damage to Aston Martin Vanquish – vicarious liability – contributory negligence Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D Employees Liability Act 1991 (NSW), s 3(1) Road Rules 2014 (NSW), rr 37, 38, 132(2A) and 198(2) Cases Cited: Baxter v Obacelo (2001) 205 CLR 635 Christmas v Nicol Bros Pty Ltd (1941) 41 SR (NSW) 317 Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers and Citizens Co-operative Assurance Co of Australia Ltd (1931) 46 CLR 41 Raper by her tutor Raper v Bowden (2016) 76 MVR 369 Scott v Davis [2000] HCA 52; 204 CLR 333 Soblusky v Egan (1960) 103 CLR 215 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Anna Koropachinsky First Defendant: Congwei Wang Second Defendant: Sunshine Solar & Electrical Pty Ltd Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr S Glascott Defendant: Mr B Y Chi (solicitor)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate