NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Anderson v The Council of Trinity Grammar School [2018] NSWSC 1633 Hearing dates: 3, 7 August 2018 Date of orders: 10 August 2018 Decision date: 24 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) The defendant's motion is dismissed;
(2) The defendant shall pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the motion. Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTION – claim against school for damages arising from sexual abuse by teacher on student – student/plaintiff abused otherwise than on school grounds – abuse occurred over 40 years ago – no limitation period for such claim – school claimed prejudice because of inability to locate files and death of certain witnesses
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to strike out or to stay proceedings permanently – abuse of process – inability to conduct fair trial – irreversible prejudice claimed – motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Cases Cited: Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256; [2006] HCA 27 Commonwealth v Introvigne (1982) 150 CLR 258; [1982] HCA 40 Connellan v Murphy [2017] VSCA 116 Estate Judd v McKnight; Gammage v Estate Judd, Channell v Estate Judd; McKnight v Estate Judd (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 462 New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511; [2003] HCA 4 Newcastle City Council v Batistatos; Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW v Batistatos (2005) 43 MVR 381; [2005] NSWCA 20 Prince Alfred College Incorporated v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134; [2016] HCA 37 S v Attorney General [2003] 3 NZLR 450; [2003] NZCA 149 The Queen v Dennis Bauer (a Pseudonym) (2018) 92 ALJR 846; [2018] HCA 40 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509; [1992] HCA 34 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Robert James Anderson (Plaintiff/Respondent) The Council of Trinity Grammar School (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: J Machonachie QC/P Tierney (Plaintiff/Respondent) N Hutley SC/E Holmes (Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate