NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Naaman (Final) [2018] NSWSC 1635 Hearing dates: 9-10 October 2018 Date of orders: 31 October 2018 Decision date: 31 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: (1) The summons is dismissed. (2) The interim supervision order made by Campbell J on 2 August 2018 and last extended by Bellew J on 25 September 2018 is discharged forthwith. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – terrorism activity offender – application for extended supervision order pursuant to Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW), Pt 2 – offender on remand for breaches of interim supervision order – offender suffering from chronic schizophrenia – statements by offender in custody expressing intolerance of non-Muslims and wish to travel to fight in Syria – criminal record of repeated dishonesty and property offences and non-compliance with authorities – history of violence against law enforcement officers – whether offender engaged in conduct "involving advocating support for any terrorist acts" – whether "unacceptable risk of committing a serious terrorism offence" if released – Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act, ss 10(c)(i), 20(d) – summons dismissed and interim supervision order discharged Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Criminal Code (Cth) Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Ceissman [2018] NSWSC 508 State of New South Wales v Naaman [2018] NSWSC 1328 State of New South Wales v Pacey [2015] NSWSC 1983 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (plaintiff) Mohamed Naaman (defendant) Attorney General of New South Wales (third-party applicant) Commissioner of Police (third-party applicant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Agius SC & Mr C McGorey (plaintiff) Mr T Edwards (defendant) Mr Richard Lee (third-party applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate