NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Junn v McBride [2018] NSWDC 325 Hearing dates: 27 – 28 April 2017 Date of orders: 01 November 2018 Decision date: 01 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: (1) Appeal allowed.
(2) Remit the matter to the Review Panel to be re-determined in light of these reasons.
(3) Order the defendant to pay half the plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: COSTS – Appeal from decision of Review Panel – Appeal limited to error of law – Failure of Review Panel to provide any or any sufficient reasons – Remitted to Review Panel to re-determine Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Legal Profession Regulation 2005 Cases Cited: Cassegrain v CTK Engineering; Cassegrain v Cassegrain [2008] NSWSC 457 Dunn v Jerrard & Stuk Lawyers [2009] NSWSC 681 Frumar v Owners of Strata Plan 36957 [2006] NSWCA 278; (2006) 67 NSWLR 321 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Whitehaven Coal Mining v Pain [2018] NSWCA 229 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Donald Martin Junn (Plaintiff) Louise McBride (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr SJ Philips (Plaintiff) Mr FM Douglas QC (Defendant)
Solicitors: Dixon Holmes Lawyers (Plaintiff) Self-represented (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/344836 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate