NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 Hearing dates: 28 September 2018 Date of orders: 02 November 2018 Decision date: 02 November 2018 Before: Payne JA at [1] Simpson AJA at [2] Johnson J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - aggregate sentence of five years' imprisonment with a non-parole-period of three years - offences of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm (s.35(2) Crimes Act 1900) and assault occasioning actual bodily harm (s.59(1) Crimes Act 1900) - victim of offences a 10-month old baby - additional offence of common assault on Form 1 - s.35(2) offence a standard non-parole period offence - whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness for both offences - sentencing for standard non-parole period offences - s.54A and s.54B Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999-– consideration of legislative amendments made by Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Non-Parole Periods) Act 2013 after Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 - proper construction of ss.54A and 54B - standard non-parole period to be taken into account on sentence as legislative guidepost - relevance of Applicant's self-induced intoxication, intellectual impairment, socially disadvantaged upbringing and moral culpability - self-induced intoxication excluded by statute from consideration as mitigating factor - other matters to be considered as part of single-stage process of instinctive synthesis to determine appropriate sentence - sentencing Judge had regard to Applicant's socially disadvantaged upbringing, intellectual impairment and moral culpability in determining sentence - error not established - whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive - sentence not manifestly excessive - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Non-Parole Periods) Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Assault and Intoxication) Act 2014 Criminal Procedure Act 1985 Cases Cited: Biddle v R [2017] NSWCCA 128 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 67 Cowan v R [2015] NSWCCA 118 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Georgopolous v R [2010] NSWCCA 246 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Khoury v R (2011) 209 A Crim R 509; [2011] NSWCCA 118 Kiernan v R [2016] NSWCCA 12 Lake Macquarie City Council v Morris (2005) 63 NSWLR 263; [2005] NSWSC 387 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 McIntyre v R (2009) 198 A Crim R 549; [2009] NSWCCA 305 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Munda v State of Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600; [2013] HCA 38 Neal v The Queen (1982) 149 CLR 305; [1982] HCA 55 Newman v R [2018] NSWCCA 208 R v Coleman (1990) 47 A Crim R 306 R v Field [2011] NSWCCA 13 R v Lolesio [2014] NSWCCA 219 R v Loveridge (2014) 243 A Crim R 31; [2014] NSWCCA 120 R v Smith [2005] NSWCCA 286 R v Tepania [2017] NSWDC 435 Sivell v R [2009] NSWCCA 286 Veen v The Queen (No. 2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Yun v R [2017] NSWCCA 317 Zreika v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Texts Cited: New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Report 134, "Sentencing - Interim Report on Standard Minimum Non-Parole Periods" (May 2012) New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Report 139, "Sentencing" (July 2013) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Atare Tepania (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Wilson (Applicant) Ms HR Roberts (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate