NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Mackie (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1654 Hearing dates: 30 October 2018 Date of orders: 30 October 2018 Decision date: 31 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: Application refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – application for trial by judge alone – where earlier jury did not return a verdict – whether trial by judge alone is in the interests of justice Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 132 Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Farrugia [2017] NSWCCA 197 R v Belghar (2012) 217 A Crim R 1; [2012] NSWCCA 86 R v Haydar (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 131 R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 4) (2015) 249 A Crim R 120; [2015] NSWSC 259 R v Stanley [2013] NSWCCA 124 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 220 CLR 517; [2005] HCA 4 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Rosemary Priscilla Mackie (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K Ratcliffe (Crown) M Avenell (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid NSW (Accused) File Number(s): 2015/353540 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. This is an application by the accused, Rosemary Priscilla Mackie, for her trial to be heard by a Judge alone pursuant to s 132(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW). The prosecutor in these proceedings does not consent to the accused being tried by a Judge alone. Pursuant to s 132(4), the order can be made if I consider it in the interests of justice to do so.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate